Note: the full-frame Sony I use is the 10bit a7s iii. No color grading other than using the transforms.Īgain, the a7iii will do even better. Here is an example of an HLG3 video that uses this method, from a camera clearly inferior to the A7 iii: LUTs are approximations to the mathematical transforms they are inferior to color management transforms (one can also use the ACES transforms). The clips will immediately look great, and then you can modify them to taste. You set ''Timeline to output gamut mapping' to "Saturation Mapping." You set 'Timeline to output tone mapping' to "Simple." You set the input color gamut to REC2020 (which is the HLG standard) and the gamma to HLG. and I have found HLG3 to be the best profile for 8bit cameras. The best way to convert HLG3 to REC709 in DaVinci Resolve is to use Resolve color management in the project settings. It does not matter what kind of videos one shoots (weddings, sports, eng, narratives, documentaries) for the best method of treating HLG3 in post. have you used the leeming lut pro corrector starter lut for hlg3 and whats been your experience of it to correct the sonys colour output in hlg3 specifically if this isnt an ideal profile what would you recommendĢ. does anyone have any wedding experience in shooting hlg3 specifically editing in davinci resolve. Ive been dabbling with HLG3 for more dynamic range etc and liking the results but to start colour grading in davinci is daunting.ġ. ![]() Im using a Sony a7iii and have usually shot cine4 as per the prev comments how easy and good in camera it looks with minimal work required to get a good look. Hi guys - re this post - im brand new to resolve - currenlty on studio 17 latest. Let me know if there are good free LUTs or paid for easing my video process. Really need your help to up my video game and editing process.Īlso I have no experience using LUTs on DaVinci Resolve. So now I've never been so confused in my life especially when starting to record video. Picking the Perfect Sony A7iii Picture Profile | Cine4 vs S Log2 vs HLGģ) Shooting indoor with incandescent light or using Aputure AL-MW portable light (tutorials/handson) My NEW PICTURE PROFILE for Sony A7III 2019! HLG, SLOG, CINE The BEST PICTURE PROFILE for the Sony a7iii (HLG vs CINE4) Working with HLG / Sony Color Modes / Matching Picture Profiles - FAQ Sony Picture Profiles & Dynamic Range Guide (Cine vs S-Log vs HLG) I have been so many videos on YouTube & bit confused between all of them here are the ones I saw. Ultimately, the question becomes, is Slog 2 actually useful for your workflow? Considering the time spent in the color grading suite and the small quirks when shooting, you should do a cost-benefit analysis and decide if it is really the right choice for you or instead Cine4 could be the better option overall.I'm starting to edit my videos in DaVinci Resolve 16.2 so wanted to know which profiles do you use to shoot videos on my A7 III in 2020. Tweaking colors and skin tones, in particular, is another serious consideration when filming with Slog 2, so as a rule, be prepared to spend more time in post while color grading your Slog 2 footage. ![]() Nailing exposure while using the log profile could be pretty tricky and overwhelming as well, especially when you don’t have enough experience with it. The lowest setting that you can use while shooting with Slog 2 is ISO 800, whereas with Cine4, you can go all the way down to ISO 200. ![]() ![]() On the other hand, Slog 2 is way more challenging to work with, not only because of the higher ISOs your camera is stuck to. There is more detail in the highlights, the roll-off is a bit smoother, and dynamic range is overall superior, but we can say that only after comparing the images side-by-side. If we go pixel peeping, however, the superior profile is with no doubt the Slog 2. Looking at the side by side comparison with a Slog 2 file we can see that actually, the final results are quite similar. Shooting in Cine4 is easier too, there is no need to overexpose the footage, as is usually advised, to have less noise in the shadows. That being said, let’s see what are the options with filmmaker Cody Blue.Īpparently, Cody has been a long time user of the Cine4 picture profile, and has been using it for so long since it’s so useful in real-world situations, and not only in post as it would be expected. Sometimes it’s easier to utilize a different picture profile, may it be because the project does not require a particular grade, or just for the time-saving. Yes, you may have your set of LUTs you use to grade quickly, but still, it’s time-consuming to pull off the perfect grade. But all of this, of course, requires time. These also provide major recovery in the highlights giving you overall a superior dynamic range. Log files are known to offer more flexibility in post-production as the use of a logarithmic compression allows camera makers to squeeze more information inside the same bitrate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |